Economist and carbon pricing expert Professor Ross Garnaut says the
Palmer United Party's position to vote to retain the RET and other key
climate change bodies will have "important" and positive effects. "We're in a better position than we were before this news," he told the ABC's 7.30 program on Thursday. "We're
in a better position than when we were facing abolition of carbon
pricing, major tampering with the Renewable Energy Target, abolition of
the Climate Change Authority, abolition of the Clean Energy Finance
Corporation.
"It may not be the ideal way of doing things, but Mr
Palmer's support for keeping existing arrangements will have important
effects." On Wednesday, Mr Palmer revealed his party would vote
with the Coalition in the Senate to repeal the carbon pricing scheme if
lower power prices were locked in, a condition the Government says it is
"happy" to enshrine in law. However PUP will vote to block the
Government's bid to abolish the Clean Energy Finance Corporation, the
Renewable Energy Target and the Climate Change Authority.
Professor
Garnaut says retaining the RET will help Australia significantly reduce
its emissions because "it's actually delivering and it will continue to
deliver". "The Renewable Energy Target is a very powerful instrument for emissions reduction," he said.
"In the first two years in the current set of
policies - carbon pricing, Renewable Energy Target, the whole lot of
policies in place - emissions fell by 14 per cent in our electricity
sector. "If the current policies are kept in place for the
Renewable Energy Target, given what's happening to electricity demand,
we'll find that by 2020 emissions in the electricity sector will be down
by well over a quarter."
Mr Palmer also revealed his party would
push for an emissions trading scheme similar to the one proposed by
former Labor prime minister Kevin Rudd, but one that would only come
into effect when Australia's main trading partners established similar
schemes. The PUP leader met Prime Minister Tony Abbott on Thursday
morning to discuss the minor party's policies just before debate
resumed in the Lower House on legislation to repeal the carbon tax. The
legislation passed on Thursday afternoon and will now be ready to be
put before the new Senate as a likely first order of business. The
billionaire businessman's party will hold three seats in the Senate, a
balance-of-power role that has been bolstered by an agreement with the
Victorian Motoring Enthusiast Party senator Ricky Muir.
Clean energy industries back PUP move
Environment
groups and emissions trading experts are concerned there could be a
possible carbon policy vacuum if the carbon price is abolished and the
Government's Direct Action program is rejected by the new Senate. "The
Government has said its current position is not to have an emissions
trading scheme, but is to have Direct Action. Palmer has said he doesn't
support Direct Action," carbon trading expert Martijn Wilder said. "So
we'll probably find ourselves in a position, if this goes according to
what's been said, that we'll have no cap whatsoever on emissions in
Australia." He says Australia does not have time to waste without effective policy in place. "We'd
be much better off retaining the emissions trading scheme that we've
got, moving to a floating price immediately, and then tying in with
schemes that are already operating around the world."
But the clean air industry has welcomed Mr Palmer's promise to block any move to cut the Renewable Energy Target. Managing
Director of Ifigen Energy, Miles George, had anticipated a significant
cut for the wind farm operator's 20,000 shareholders, most of whom are
foreign institutional investors. "They would be very pleased that
there is a voice calling for some stability in the legislation that
would protect the value of existing investments made in good faith," Mr
George said. "[And that] has the potential to provide a signal
that will get our industry going again after two years of being frozen
pretty much."
Mr Palmer also promised his party would vote against
the abolition of the Climate Change Authority and the Clean Energy
Finance Corporation.Martijn Wilder, head of Baker &
McKenzie's Global Environmental Markets practice, says PUP's policy on
the finance corporation is "a good outcome". "The act was set up
to make investments. The corporation has been making investments and
been making money, and a lot of those investments are received very
positively," Mr Wilder said. "For many of the stakeholders
looking to the CEFC for finance, it is a very positive measure and it
will continue to produce abatement at almost no cost."
No comments:
Post a Comment