Three years after Myanmar’s transition to
civilian leadership led to the end of trade embargoes and a rapid
embrace of technology, the country still labors under a barely
functioning telecommunications network and a power grid that only
reaches a third of the population.
But the lack of infrastructure also presents an unexpected
blessing, experts say: a blank slate for renewable energy. This concept
has raised hopes that the country can avoid the environmental
devastation that big energy projects have brought to its neighbors China
and India.
"A country endowed with natural and energy resources, Myanmar is in
an optimal position for green, resilient, and environmentally
sustainable development,’’ said a World Economic Forum report, New Energy Architecture: Myanmar.
According to the Ministry of Electrical Power, Myanmar has enough
generating capacity to power about 67 percent of Yangon and 33 percent
of Mandalay, however most of the rest of the country remains dark.
Myanmar, which exports natural gas to neighboring Thailand under
contracts signed by its former military government, has suffered an
energy deficit for years.
More than 40 percent of Myanmar’s installed capacity across the
energy mix has been sidelined due to neglect and a lack of available
spare parts. This leaves only about 1.97 gigawatts (GW) operational out
of a total of 3.361 GW, according to the Ministry of Electrical Power
(MOEP). Neighboring Thailand, with a similar population, has 32.4
gigawatts of installed capacity.
Myanmar’s economy is tiny compared to its neighbors, but global
consultant firm McKinsey and Company sees strong growth as high as 8
percent per annum possible in seven key sectors, including
mining/energy, manufacturing and tourism. With demand growing an
estimated 15 percent annually, this growth will require a massive
expansion in power generating capacity.
A Small Solution?
Supporters of renewable energy say that there is an opportunity for
smaller electricity distribution networks to be established in rural
areas off the central grid, dubbed “minigrids,” powered by solar, biogas
and small-scale hydro where possible.
Andy Schroeter founder and CEO of Laos-based Sunlabob renewable
energy systems provider says that minigrids offer a number of benefits
that can drive development in Myanmar, including opportunities to use
refrigeration and food processing to add value to agriculture products
or just wait for better market prices. They can also provide direct
employment opportunities as plant operators to local villagers, and
educate consumers on the need to pay for their electricity, which novice
consumers are occasionally reluctant to do. Schroeter brings over a
decade of experience working in Laos and other frontier nations. He says
ease of connectivity between minigrids, which allows them to link into
regional grids, actually pulls the national grid towards them and
hastens full connectivity. Importantly, Schroeter is running a business,
not an NGO, and Sunlabob guarantees Purchase Power agreements are
implemented. To Myanmar’s power problem, “the only answer is minigrids,”
says Schroeter.
Decentralized renewable energy minigrids seem to have growing
potential, but many see them as short-term solutions until more
conventional energy capacity can be built up. On the sidelines of the
2013 Myanmar Energy Investment Conference, Knut Sierotzki, Director for
Hydropower in Asia and Russia for Norwegian hydropower consultancy Poyry
Energy Ltd, said that minigrids are “a good addition… but will not
solve the electrification of the country.” Poyry, along with many other
foreign hydropower firms, is looking for opportunities in Myanmar’s
burgeoning hydropower industry.
Big Potential
Myanmar has huge potential for hydropower, up to 100 GW, according to
the Ministry of Electric Power (MEP). Currently, 65 percent of
Myanmar’s energy infrastructure is in hydropower, which generates over
70 percent of their energy supply, and this ratio looks likely to
continue. Hydropower is less attractive to environmentalists due to
potentially massive impacts on local ecologies and societies, the high
emissions involved in concrete making and pouring, not to mention
potential methane build up in the water. As a renewable, hydro is also
subject to the seasons, generating large amounts of power during the
rainy season but less — sometimes not enough — during the hot season,
when the demand is highest and brownouts are common in Yangon.
Yet for cheap, consistent power, the government feels that hydropower
is the best option. Deputy Director Tint Lwin Oo, of the Department of
Hydropower Planning under the MEP, says that hydropower presented ‘‘a
very good chance for us to get cheap load-direct power,’’ due to its low
operating costs and free fuel. He also notes that most of Myanmar’s
hydro options are in the high mountains with very few people, “so they
have a low social impact.”
Deputy Director Tint Lwin Oo of the MOEP said at least seven dams are
nearing completion, adding 520 megawatts of installed capacity and
capable of generating 2,387 megawatt hours of power. Another 24 projects
are under investigation with the potential to add another 12 GW of
installed capacity. Mr. Tint Lwin Oo says that the government has
another 30 GW of hydropower capacity under consideration. Meanwhile, the
MOEP is looking to add 450 MW of natural gas fired capacity by 2015 to
mitigate dry season hydro shortages.
A technical adviser to the Wildlife Conservation Society says he is
guardedly optimistic about hydropower, noting that in areas of the
Kachin state, sites being looked are steep gorges that if flooded, will
have less impact on the environment. “All dams will require tradeoffs
and deep steep reservoirs are likely to destroy fewer habitats for
animals and people compared to wide shallow reservoirs,” he notes.
Roadblocks Remain
But even if new sources of power come online quickly in Myanmar,
significant obstacles remain. National policies on issues like
environmental impact and social impact assessments have not been
finalized. The World Economic Forum report says the lack
of ‘‘transparent institutional and legal framework for exploration,
development and deployment of energy systems’’ is choking investment in
renewables.
Myanmar is well situated to quadruple its GDP by 2030, according to McKinsey, but its report Myanmar’s Moment: Unique Opportunities, Major Challenges,
noted that the government is “working within extremely tight
constraints in terms of its capacity, finances and time.” Myanmar has a
GDP of just over US$50 billion, compared to US$346 for Thailand.
Myanmar’s poverty needs, along with the cost of fighting several
insurgencies in the tribal areas leave little money available for
renewable energy R&D.
"We have encountered many financial problems, so we can’t recruit, we
can’t buy new equipment," said Win Khaing Moe, Director General for the
Myanma Scientific and Technological Research Department under the
Ministry of Science and Technology. Myanmar also suffers from a lack of
trained personnel and certifiable data, according to the World Economic
Forum.
Whether Myanmar will follow a green path toward a robust power grid
remains to be seen. Outsiders are guardedly optimistic that Myanmar is
sincere in its stated wish to develop sustainably. The US Embassy in
Myanmar spokesperson noted that that they have seen “positive signs”
that the government “is taking sustainability seriously.”
Back to Basics
But Mr. Min ultimately questions the entire value system that is
being imported to Myanmar. He feels that this high energy, high
consumption lifestyle previously little known in Myanmar is undermining
the nation’s own perfectly functioning — and sustainable — lifestyle. He
feels that instead of focusing on big energy products that will benefit
the ruling class in the capital city, Naypyidaw, he advocates for a
more modest goal of using renewable energy to improve traditional
lifestyles without fundamentally changing them. "They have been living
like that for the last 2,000 years; it’s a good model," he said.
Source:- renewable energy world
No comments:
Post a Comment