While India’s progress in the renewable energy sector has been
impressive, effective implementation of the RPO framework is crucia.Recently the Union ministry of new and renewable energy
(MNRE) asked the ministry of power (MoP) to make the Renewable Purchase
Obligation (RPO) compliance mandatory for states if they want to avail
funds for financial restructuring of their utilities. RPOs, put simply,
are the minimum percentages of the total power that electricity
distribution companies and some large power consumers need to purchase
from renewable energy (RE) sources. RPO creates a minimum market for
renewables in the absence of pricing externalities of conventional power
generation.
While the National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) has set an
ambitious RPO target of 15% by 2020, it is the state electricity
regulatory commissions (SERC) that set year-wise targets in their
respective states. While 28 out of 29 states have such targets in place
for solar and non-solar sources separately, there is an increasing
concern over actual compliance. Data for a few major states for the last
two-three years reveals that barring utilities in states such as
Karnataka, most others have failed to meet their RPO targets.Reduction of RPO targets to accommodate the concerns of
utilities has been a common measure taken by SERCs. After achieving an
RPO compliance of 5.78% in Rajasthan in 2011-12, the Rajasthan ERC
reduced its earlier RPO target from 8.5% to 6%. Similarly Tamil Nadu ERC
reduced its RPO target from 14% to 9% despite the state utility
achieving a compliance of 9.59%. Gujarat ERC allowed its distribution
licensees to carry forward the shortfall for FY 2011-12 to be met in FY
2012-13. Considering the excess solar generation in Gujarat in 2012-13
(over its mandated RPO), it allowed the state utility to count this
towards compliance of the non-solar RPO to remove the burden on the
distribution licensee.
For FY 2010-11 and 2011-12, Maharashtra appeared to have
achieved its RPO targets of 6% and 7%, respectively. However, the RPO
compliance data collated by the designated state nodal agency,
Maharashtra Energy Development Agency, seems to have included renewable
energy units wheeled under the network under open access (OA) and
credited them to the utility’s account. For 2011-12, if one does not
consider units wheeled under OA, then the RPO compliance drops sharply
to 4.49%. While the regulator did seek the explanation for this counting
of wheeled RE towards RPO compliance from Maharashtra State Electricity
Distribution Co. Ltd, it did not take any further action in this
matter. This issue is bound to come back when the OA consumers’ RPO
compliance will be taken up.
Fortunately, there are encouraging signs with some state
ERC's (Maharashtra, MP, UT's, Uttarakhand, Punjab, etc.) beginning to flex
their muscles against RPO defaulters. For example, besides setting a
deadline to cumulatively fulfill RPO's, Maharashtra ERC has explicitly
directed that any future non-compliance would result in the ERC invoking
the penal clause from their regulations. However, there are many other
steps which state ERCs can proactively take to facilitate this process.
An effective web-based automated monitoring and verification system for
RE generation/procurement is essential to operationalize compliance
reporting. While most state ERCs’ RPO regulations indicate quarterly
compliance reporting, this is hardly followed up.
please explain some more about NAPCC
ReplyDelete